A Rebuttal of JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes’ Recent Call for Faux-Modernization

(click on image to view original tweet)

(click on image to view original tweet)

Boston Business Journal has printed an opinion piece by the CEO of JetBlue, Robin Hayes. Very similar pieces have appeared in the past few months, offered by other airline CEOs and the lobbyist Airlines for America, all spreading the same unsubstantiated claims that ATC privatization and NextGen implementation are needed. It strongly appears that, this week, the rotation went to JetBlue, hence the piece. And, given the mainstream media’s consistent subservience to commerce, it comes as no surprise that Mr. Hayes’ opinion piece was eagerly accepted and passed on for public consumption.

Here is a PDF copy, with highlighted footnotes added by aiREFORM.com:

Click on the image below for a scrollable view; the PDF file may be downloaded.

‘They Paved Paradise & Put Up a NextGen Route’

A pivotal song in the early environmental movement is Big Yellow Taxi, by Joni Mitchell.

Fresh in 1970, and still just as brilliant 46-yrs later. Turns out, the tune lends itself well to lyrics that point to the many failures of NextGen.
20150528.. Big NextGen Noise (lyrics)

Thank you, Joni Mitchell, for your great work and your Heart of Gold!

FAA’s NextGen Noise Has No Limits

The California Redwoods are a national treasure, a deep sensual experience. The Redwoods are yours to see, feel, smell and ponder … but you won’t want to hear them.

KSFO.20160425scp.. sossantacruz sign along road in redwoodsBring hearing protection; the experience has been destroyed by FAA’s NextGen.

Pennsylvania to Vote in Primaries This Tuesday

(click on image to view tweet with short video clip)

(click on image to view tweet with short video clip)

20121105pic.. Flooding at KLGA post, Delta jetbridge

Flooding at La Guardia Airport caused by Hurricane Sandy, in 2012.

Today is the last Sunday before the presidential primaries in five key states, including Pennsylvania. I ran across a tweet with a short video clip at a Bernie Sanders rally, and a speaker noting that climate change will cause the airport at Philadelphia to become flooded. I have thoroughly studied airports across the nation, and have blogged before about flooding risks impacting Florida as well as LaGuardia and other major airports. But, until hearing this Bernie 2016 speaker, I had always assumed the Philly airport was at a safer and higher elevation. So, I looked up the data; the speaker was absolutely correct.
The major hub airport at Philadelphia [KPHL] is on the north bank of the Delaware River, not far from the northern tip of the Chesapeake Bay. A look at the Airport Diagram shows that all four KPHL runways are very vulnerable to flooding; low points on each of the four runways are between 8-ft MSL and 10-ft MSL. While FAA is spending billions to further overdevelop KPHL, we are ignoring the risks of flooding, which grow greater each year. All to subsidize airline profits and prop up wasteful airport programs and corrupt incumbent politicians.

(four low elevations marked with yellow boxes)

(four low elevations marked with yellow boxes)

Pennsylvania gets to vote in the primaries this week. We have endured too many decades of top-down control by the two major parties, and the balance continues to tip toward expanding the wealth gap, enriching elected officials (like the Clintons), all while a full-blown oligarchy is setting in. We need real and rational change, and it is more easily done now than later.

There is only one candidate who accepts the real threat to our planet caused by our excessive consumption of fossil fuels. There is only one candidate who is not beholden to money interests such as the fossil fuel industry, the Av-Gov complex, the banks, pharma, etc. There is only one candidate demanding an end to our corrupt ‘pay-to-play’ politics … demanding real reforms so we have effective governance that is transparent and accountable. That candidate is Bernie Sanders.

Mental Health and Aircraft Noise: Frankly, Who Gives a Damn?

Image

Here’s a screen-cap of a tweet, linked to a thoughtful article about how aviation noise undermines mental health…

(click on image to view article at HACA,org.uk, or click here for a PDF copy)

(click on image to view article at HACAN,org.uk, or click here for a PDF copy), or click here for the original tweet.

U.S. Aviation Impact Activists Can Learn a Lot by Looking at London’s Gatwick Hub

One of the oldest activist groups fighting to manage aviation impacts and preserve their local community is the Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign (GACC.org.uk).  This group has been around since 1968. The website for GACC.org.uk is impressive, and well worth a look … especially for anyone near a U.S. airport searching for ways to reduce hub-related NextGen impacts.

A significant detail about Gatwick is that this airport operates using a single runway; thus, it’s closest stateside equivalent would be the San Diego International Airport [KSAN].

Gatwick is the second-busiest airport in the UK, behind Heathrow. And, as discussed in an earlier aiREFORM Post about Heathrow, the traffic intensity is amplified by airline hubbing, nearly all related to international and transatlantic flights. Management of environmental impacts is made worse by the fact that both Gatwick and Heathrow have been ‘privatized’, in schemes where private equity firms and other financial interests acquire the airports. This is problematic because it appears to further insulate all the stakeholders (airlines, airport authorities, and national regulators) from accountability, as they can now hide behind the idea that ‘investors abroad must be protected’. And so it is that in the UK, too, schemes such as the narrow repetitive NextGen-related routes are destroying neighborhoods while enhancing airline profits. [NOTE: the European equivalent of FAA’s ‘NextGen’ program is SESAR, which stands for Single European Sky ATM Research; click here to view a copy of the 152-page SESAR plan dated 3/30/2009, or click here to read a comparison of NextGen & SESAR in a 10/18/2011 presentation]

A frequent argument against expansion of both Gatwick [EGKK] and Heathrow [EGLL] is that the addition of any new runway(s) will only exacerbate a pre-existing economic disparity across regions of the UK. The conflict is between the ‘north’ and the ‘southeast’. Specifically, because the two largest UK airports are in the southeast, the potential job and economic benefits that airports allegedly create are not shared with regions to the north. Effectively, aviation is a parasitic form of economic development, advantaging one region while disadvantaging another region.

This is a problem in the U.S., too. That is to say, for every superHub airport being expanded even further beyond manageable traffic levels ([KATL], [KCLT], [KORD] are three examples), there are numerous other airports in decline, with billions in development costs going unused. All it takes is for the dominant airline to abandon a hub and, within a few years, the entire airport begins to look like an unmarketable brownfield. In the U.S., the most notable examples include: United at Cleveland [KCLE], American at St. Louis [KSTL], USAir at Pittsburgh [KPIT], and Delta at Cincinnati [KCVG] or Detroit [KDTW].

It is notable that aviation regulators such as FAA and NATS have a huge opportunity to resolve these problems. All it takes is the establishment of sound national policies that disincentivize hub overdevelopment. A more evenly distributed aviation system, imposed in the U.S. or UK (or both!), would yield these three substantial benefits:

  1. it would broaden dispersal of economic benefits;
  2. it would reduce and even eliminate noise and pollutant impacts by repetitive flights; and…
  3. it would greatly improve the so-called ‘customer experience’ that airline CEOs and A4A are increasingly talking about; i.e., it would reduce or eliminate connection hassles while also reducing total flight times for passengers!

For an indexed compilation of some key Gatwick-related documents, as copied from the GACC website, please see page two of this Post:

NextGen Impacting Baltimore … and Why Congress Is Also Failing

The video about NextGen impacts recently posted by activists south of San Francisco is resonating far away, even near Baltimore, Maryland. Below is text from an email sent by a Maryland homeowner who has experienced the same noise and pollutant intensification due to NextGen route concentration:

I came across your website and first want to thank you for creating it. At the moment I’m feeling completely powerless in my current quest to do something about the effects of NextGen in my small town in Maryland.

The NextGen program was implemented at BWI last fall, and since then we have seen a ridiculous increase in air traffic over our neighborhood. There are days when it is virtually constant. We bought our house in this neighborhood last summer before we knew anything about NextGen. We had a few planes here and there, but they were at higher altitudes and not so bothersome. People here are used to some noise, as we are about 13 miles from BWI. But I, like you, have kids that I would like to protect. I’d like them to be able to swim in our pool without being worried that they are constantly breathing in particle pollution. The NextGen noise corridor also goes directly over several of our schools, our sports fields, and many neighborhoods from Annapolis and all the way north to the airport. I just feel like we never get a break from the planes, no matter where we go.

Here is the FAA letter I received. Interestingly enough, the letter says that there were environmental studies done for our area? But it’s my understanding that NextGen was exempted from EA. Also, their statements about noise and air pollution contradicts everything I’m reading, and more importantly, what I’m witnessing in my own neighborhood. It’s beyond frustrating.

Frankly, receiving yet another email like this further reinforces the obvious reality: FAA is a captured agency, and our Congress is essentially out to lunch. In the context of the current election debates, it is quite clear that our Congress has become derelict and is no longer compelling agency accountability.

How can we explain this? Decades ago, Congress passed legislation that taxed system users – especially airline passengers and people sending packages by air – to generate billions each year, for redistribution in ‘airport development’. We now have thousands of airports that have been developed, redeveloped, and developed again, all at public expense. Compared to other transportation infrastructure, airports are overdeveloped … and there is an awful lot of airport infrastructure that is severely underutilized (check out any major airport in Ohio, for example, such as [KCVG], with a triple parallel runway but abandoned by Delta, so today’s ops are down 75% from peak!). What’s more, the majority of today’s aviation impacts are being caused by airport development that would not happen if we did not continue to collect and use these public funds.

So, why does this problem continue? Well, it distills down to money. Our elected officials greatly enhance their chances for reelection if they bring home airport grant monies and smile in front of oversized checks. They have become severely addicted to money; this means that they just cannot say no to federal grants. Democrat and Republican members alike thus become subject to the proverb: “Don’t bite the hand that feeds you.”

FAA serves out the money, so while the voice in front of the camera may sound critical, the heart behind the voice always votes what FAA wants. In other words, the MAIN BENEFICIARIES of the current system are the agency (FAA) and the elected officials (Congress), none of whom are held accountable, yet all of whom can ‘look busy’ while issuing grant monies and waddling ineffectively while failing to fix the problems. Yup, create a problem then sustain the problem so you will always look busy!

Think about it for a minute and you can actually see: it behooves Congress to have FAA screwing up regularly, as this predictable failure ‘churns’ work, creating endless opportunities for Congress to ‘look’ busy. And it then circles back around: when an elected official browbeats FAA, FAA then looks busy, too, responding to the criticism while failing to resolve problems created by FAA itself! And ALWAYS, within their superficial responses (such as FAA’s response letter, signed by Diane Crean for Carmine Gallo), FAA will repeat the same slick phrases and empty assertions that prop up the many layers of propaganda and misinformation. What a racket!!

Video Brilliantly Presents NextGen Impacts

(click on image to view video)

(click on image to view video)

Check out this video by Bay Area Activists. This is the latest in a fourteen-month effort, involving hundreds of residents who seek to restore peace and quality of life diminished by NextGen’s SERFR arrival.

The creativity and research by these Bay Area activists is absolutely brilliant. And more activist groups keep forming; try these links: QuietSkiesLosAltosHills, QuietSkiesMidPen, SkyPossePaloAlto, SOSSC.


See also:
  • 2/19/2016 – SERFR: FAA’s ‘Acoustical Sewerline’ over the Santa Cruz area
  • 10/13/2015 – Citizen’s Noise Monitoring (website)
  • 8/26/2015 – NextGen is Being Used to Justify Lower & Noisier Flying While Ignoring the Impacts