AIRR: Going Nowhere (while Shuster schleps in Florida!)

FAA’s arrogance in ignoring NextGen noise impacts is legendary, but that arrogance is amazingly exceeded by Bill Shuster, Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. And, it is all a glaring conflict of interest.

On Day One, Mister Shuster is waterboy for lobbyist Airlines for America (A4A), pushing a poisoned legislative proposal that would grant the airlines control of ATC via a so-called ‘not-for-profit privatization’ scheme; on Day Two, Mr. Schuster is ‘on the beach and tipping cocktails’, hanging in Florida with his best buddies: lobbyist A4A CEO Nick Calio, and A4A VP of Government Affairs Shelley Rubino. Oh, and the A4A Government Affairs VP also happens to be ‘engaged’ in a personal relationship with Mr. Shuster.

Click on the image below for a scrollable view; the PDF file may be downloaded.

The rollout of the Shuster/A4A legislative proposal included clearly coordinated support by all the intended beneficiaries: representatives Shuster & LoBiondo, lobby Airlines for America, and even the controllers union, NATCA (though the vast majority of controllers quickly rose up, charging their elected leaders with selling out the future … and other FAA employee unions were quick to distance themselves from NATCA’s Executive Board decision). But, there was strong opposition even at the rollout. Even before the big shows – the Hearing on 2/10/2016, and the Markup on 2/11/2016 – the Republican committee members voiced a clear opposition to the proposed ATC privatization. The legislative proposal was rolled out on February 3rd, but an article by Jazz Shaw at HotAir.com provided a copy of a leaked memo showing five substantial points why the House Freedom Caucus opposes this FAA restructuring plan:

  1. The AIRR Act is Not Conservative
  2. Creates a New Special-interest Bureaucracy
  3. Diminishes Congressional Oversight
  4. A High Cost to Taxpayers and a Sweet Deal for Unions
  5. The Proposal is Less Safe

Despite their strong conservative opposition, at the Markup, eight days after the rollout, conservative members rejoined ranks. Nearly every amendment vote produced a strict party-line split: Republicans (34 seats on the committee) consistently outnumbering Democrats (25 seats on the committee).

Bear in mind, Shuster wanted to introduce this legislation a full year ago, but was forced to delay and retool, due to the growing FAA NextGen debacles. So, in total, the Shuster/A4A proposal is seeing opposition from everyone EXCEPT the cronies who stand to reap the core of the intended special interest gain: i.e., the only consistent support comes from industry (A4A and the airlines), the NATCA NEB members (all of whom are near retirement), and the Congress-critters who earn campaign contributions by advocating for this bad idea.

At time 9:21:58 of the nearly ten-hour Markup, just prior to the quick series of final votes, Representative DeFazio offered this comment: “…(the amendments) are generally – how would you describe them – tweaks to the imaginary ATC corporation (laughter) … they would make it better, if it happened (more laughter)….”.

In other words, the Shuster/A4A proposal distills down to just one big joke – a waste of our time and money.


See also:
  • 2/23/2016 – ‘FAA reform bill raises concern from Queens leaders’
  • 2/22/2016 – ‘The FAA restructuring bill already looks like it’s on life support’
  • 2/22/2016 – ‘AIRR Delayed Amid ATC Reform Opposition’
  • 2/12/2016 – LAMA Resolution opposed to HR4441
  • 2/4/2016 – ‘Republicans Introduce Plan to Remove 30K People From the Federal Government’s Payroll’

Even with all this opposition and concern, the talking heads at the source keep trying to sell this crap; check out this USA Today interview of an A4A mouthpiece: